Postgraduation in Puccamp: self and out evaluations
Keywords:
postgraduation, evaluation, scientific productionAbstract
Every postgraduation course must be evaluatcd in order to change the negatives variables. The aim was to studycomparativcly thc federal evaluation(CAPES) and the self evaluation ofthe tivepostgraduationcourses of PUCCAMP. ln the last case, one specific scale was used. The results showed variations in accord with scientific areas in the two cvaluation. There are no significant correlation in the comparations of the two evaluation.
Downloads
References
CRUZ CARDONA, V. (1991). Evaluatión, selección y acreditación de Programas de Postgrado: guia de autoevaluación. Cal.: Universidade Ibero-Americana de Postgrado.
DOMINGUES, C.M. (1994). Discurso cientifico: análise das dissertações da Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola
- UNlCAMP. Tese de Mestrado, PUCCAMP, Campi nas.
DREW, C. J. HARDMAN, M.L. (1985). Designing and conducting behavior research. New York: Pergamon Press.
DURHAN, E.R. & SCHAWARTZMAN, S. (Orgs.) (1992). Avaliação de Ensino Superior. São Paulo: U.S.P.
ERASMlE, T. & LIMA, L. C. (1993). Investigação e Projetos de Desenvolvimento em Educação. Minho: Universidade do Minho.
PATTERSON, L. (1993). Teacher are rescarches: rejlec tionand action. Newark: IRA.
PUCCAMP-Reitoria(1994). Plano Gestão 93/96. Campi nas: PUCCAMP.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1996 Geraldina Porto Witter, José Benedito A. David
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
