Cooking Skills Index: Development and reliability assessment
Palavras-chave:
Cooking, Reproducibility of Results, Self-efficacy, Surveys and QuestionnairesResumo
Objective
Describe the development and the reliability assessment of an index that evaluates the confi dence in performing cooking skills considered relevant in Brazil.
Methods
The development of the Cooking Skills Index was based on the self-effi cacy beliefs and its theoretical reference was the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. It measures, from zero to 100, the degree of confi dence in performing ten cooking skills considered as facilitators for the implementation of Brazilian Dietary Guidelines recommendations. Experts (face validity) evaluated the index. A pilot study (n=10) and a test-retest (n=51) was conducted by telephone interviews and computerized assistance with adults responsible for food preparationat home in São Paulo. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha, quadratic weighted kappa and prevalence and bias adjusted kappa.
Results
The Cooking Skills Index was coherent with the adopted theoretical framework according to the experts. It was fast and easy to apply to the participants. It showed a good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.70) and an acceptable to excellent reproducibility (weighted kappa=0.55, adjusted kappa=0.89).
Conclusion
The Cooking Skills Index has a good reliability and is therefore recommended to evaluate cooking skills confidence in Brazilian studies developed in contexts similar to those of this study.
Referências
Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac JC, Levy RB, Louzada MLC, Jaime PC. The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017000234
Lang T, Caraher M. Is there a culinary skills transition? Data and debate from the UK about changes in cooking culture. J HEIA. 2001;8(2):2-14.
Mills S, White M, Brown H, Wrieden W, Kwasnicka D, Halligan J, et al. Health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking: A systematic review of observational studies. Appetite. 2017;111:116-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.022
Hartmann C, Dohle S, Siegrist M. Importance of cooking skills for balanced food choices. Appetite. 2013;65:125-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.016
Smith LP, Ng SW, Popkin BM. Trend in US home food preparation and consumption: Analysis of national nutrition surveys and time use studies from 1965-1966. Nutr J. 2013;12(45):1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-12-45
Ministério da Saúde (Brasil). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Guia alimentar para a população brasileira. 2a ed. Brasília: MS; 2014 [citado 2018 maio 18]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_alimentar_populacao_brasileira_2ed.pdf
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome (Brasil). Marco de referência de educação alimentar e nutricional para as políticas públicas. Brasília: MDS; 2012 [citado 2018 out 23]. Disponível em: https://rebrae.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/03.-Marco-de-Refer%C3%AAncia-de-EAN.pdf
Castro IRR, Souza TSN, Maldonado LA, Canine ES, Rotenberg S, Gugelmin SA. A culinária na promoção da alimentação saudável: delineamento e experimentação de método educativo dirigido a adolescentes e a profissionais das redes de saúde e de educação. Rev Nutr. 2007;20(6):571-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-52732007000600001
Diez-Garcia RW, Castro IRR. A culinária como objeto de estudo e de intervenção no campo da Alimentação e Nutrição. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2011;16(1):91-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000100013
Begley A, Gallegos D. What’s cooking for dietetics? A review of the literature. Nutr Diet. 2010;67(1):26-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0080.2010.01406.x
McGowan L, Caraher M, Raats M, Lavelle F, Hollywood L, McDowell D, et al. Domestic cooking and food skills: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(11):2412-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1072495
Department of Health (United Kingdom). National diet and nutrition survey: Appendix D interviewer (stage 1) overview of elements and documents. 2011 [cited 2012 Out 5]. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_128543.pdf
Barton KL, Wrieden WL, Anderson AS. Validity and reliability of a short questionnaire for assessing the impact of cooking skills interventions. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011;24(6):588-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2011.01180.x
Jomori MM, Proença RPC, Echevarria-Guanilo ME, Bernardo GL, Uggioni PL, Fernandes AC. Construct validity of Brazilian cooking skills and healthy eating questionnaire by the known-groups method. Br Food J. 2017;119(5):1003-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-0448
Lera L, Fretes G, González CG, Salinas J, Vio F. Validación de un instrumento para evaluar consumo, hábitos y prácticas alimentarias en escolares de 8 a 11 años. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31(5):1977-1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.3305/nh.2015.31.5.8607
Lavelle F, McGowan L, Spence M, Caraher M, Raats MM, Hollywood L, et al. Barriers and facilitators to cooking from ‘scratch’ using basic or raw ingredients: A qualitative interview study. Appetite. 2016;107:e383-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.024
Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16:234-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
Cummings SR, Hulley SB. Elaborando questionários e entrevistas. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Delineando a pesquisa clínica: uma abordagem epidemiológica. 3a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2008. p.259-74.
Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. 2006 [cited 2016 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanduraGuide2006.pdf
Bandura A, Azzi RG, Polydoro S. Teoria social cognitiva: conceitos básicos. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2008.
Nadler JT, Weston R, Voyles EC. Stuck in the middle: The use and interpretation of midpoints in items on questionnaires. J Gen Psychol. 2015;142(2):71-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.994590
Ministério da Saúde (Brasil). Vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico. 2018 [citado 2018 mar 6]. Disponível em: http://portalms.saude.gov.br/vigilancia-em-saude/indicadores-de-saude/vigilancia-de-fatores-de-risco-e-protecao-para-doencas-cronicas-por-inqueritotelefonico-vigitel
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):257-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/85.3.257
Landis JR, Kock GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 [cited 2017 Feb 10];33(1):159-74. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310
Tran KM, Johnson RK, Soultanakis RP, Matthews DE. In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: Validation with doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100(7):777-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00227-3
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Carla Adriano MARTINS, Larissa Galastri BARALDI, Fernanda Baeza SCAGLIUSI, Betzabeth Slater VILLAR, Carlos Augusto MONTEIRO
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
