Paths to urban mobility and accessibility

challenges and perceptions of older adults in the city of Pelotas (Rio Grande do Sul)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0919v22e2025a12958

Keywords:

City, Urban design, Healthy aging, Urban planning

Abstract

This study analyzes urban mobility and accessibility based on the perception of older adults aged 60 and over in the city of Pelotas (RS), located in southern Brazil. The objective is to identify the challenges that these people face daily when moving and accessing services, amenities, leisure and housing spaces in urban areas characterized by different socioeconomic conditions. Data collection was based on the application of two qualitative methods: Participatory Mapping and World Café. The methodology sought, through a participatory approach, to enhance the voice of residents and understand which aspects should be considered as a priority to plan agefriendly communities, that is, that provide all the support necessary for healthy aging with access to support and possibilities for safe movement. Data collected in three communities are presented in this article: the Central area, representing a higher income, a section of the Fragata neighborhood, representing an average income, and the Navegantes subdivision, representing a lower income. The data collected and analyzed is part of an international research project called “Place-Making with Older People: Towards Age Friendly Communities”, conducted between 2016 and 2021 and funded by the British agency ESRC. The results highlighted fundamental issues such as safety and walkability, indicating that the possibility of remaining active in the neighborhood is directly linked to the perception of safety when traveling. It is hoped that the discussions presented can contribute to research in the field
of public police, urban planning, and urban design for older adults.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, S. et al. Participatory resource mapping. International Institute for Environment and Development, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/17401IIED.pdf. Acesso em: 5 maio 2024.

Araújo, F. E.; Anjos, R. S.; Rocha-Filho, G. B. Mapeamento participativo: conceitos, métodos e aplicações. Boletim de Geografia, v. 35, n. 2, p. 128-140, 2017. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/bolgeogr.v35i2.31673.

Bezerra, F. C.; Almeida, M. I.; Nobrega-Therrien, S. M. Estudos sobre evelhecimento no Brasil: Revisão Bibliográfica. Revista Brasileira de Gereatria e Gereontologia, v. 15, n. 1, p. 155-167, 2012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-98232012000100017.

Brown, J.; Isaacs, D. The World Café: living knowledge through conversations that matter. The Systems Thinker, v. 12, n. 5, p. 1-5, 2001. Disponível em: https://thesystemsthinker.com/the-world-cafe-living-knowledgethrough-conversations-that-matter/. Acesso em: 5 maio 2024.

Buffel, T.; Phillipson, C.; Scharf, T. Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Critical Social Policy, v. 38, n. 3, p. 493-513, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430457.

Buffel, T.; et al. Theorising the Relationship between Older People and their Immediate Social Living Environment. International Journal of Lifelong Education, v. 30, n. 1, p. 13-32, 2012. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2012.636577.

Brasil. Lei nº 10.098, de 19 de dezembro de 2000. Estabelece normas gerais e critérios básicos para a promoção da acessibilidade das pessoas portadoras de deficiência ou com mobilidade reduzida, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União: seção 1, Brasília, DF, 20 dez. 2000.

Brasil. Ministério das Cidades. Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana Sustentável. Cadernos MCidades, n. 6, 2004.

Brasil. Lei nº 12.587, de 3 de janeiro de 2012. Institui as diretrizes da Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana; revoga dispositivos dos Decretos-Lei n. 3.194, de 24 de janeiro de 1941, e 3.198, de 27 de fevereiro de 1941, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União: seção 1, Brasília, DF, 4 jan. 2012.

Comissão Econômica para a América Latina. Panorama social da América Latina 2011. Santiago: CEPAL, 2011. Cochrane, L.; Corbett, J. Participatory Mapping. In: Servaes, J. (ed.). Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change. Cham: Springer, 2018. p. 375-395. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8_6-1.

Cox, K. R. Man, Location and Behavior: an introduction to human geography. New York: Wiley, 1972.

Emmel, N. P. Participatory Mapping: An innovative sociological method. Toolkit #03. Real Life Methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, 2008. Disponível em: https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/540/2/2008-07-toolkit-participatory-map.pdf. Acesso em: 5 maio 2024.

Finkelstein, J. Diagrama da hierarquia das necessidades de Maslow. Wikipedia, 2007. Disponível em: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs.svg. Acesso em: 19 maio 2024.

Fouché, C.; Light, G. An invitation to dialogue: ‘The World Café’ in social work research. Qualitative Social Work, v. 10, n. 1, p. 28-48, 2011. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473325010376016.

Gutiérrez, A. Movilidad o inmovilidad: ¿qué es la movilidad? Aprendiendo a delimitar los deseos. XV CLATPU, Buenos Aires, 2012. Disponível em: https://ingenieria.uncuyo.edu.ar/catedras/movilidad-o-inmovilidad-quees-la-movilidad-aprendiendo-a-delimitar-los-deseos.pdf. Acesso em: 5 maio 2024.

Herbolsheimer, F. et al. Relationship between social isolation and indoor and outdoor physical activity in community-dwelling older adults in Germany: Findings from the ActiFE study. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, v. 25, n. 3, p. 387-394, 2017. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1123/japa.2016%2D0060.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios contínua: características gerais dos domicílios e dos moradores 2021. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2021.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Síntese de indicadores sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira 2022. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2022.

Kalache, A.; Veras, R. P.; Ramos, L. R. O Envelhecimento da população mundial. um desafio novo. Revista Saúde Pública, v. 21, n. 3, p. 200-210, 1987. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101987000300005.

Lawson, B. The Language of Space. Architetural Press. Oxford, UK: Routledge, 2000. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780080509969.

Löhr, K.; Weinhardt, M.; Sieber, S. The “World Cafe” as a Participatory ´ Method for Collecting Qualitative Data. International Journal of Qualitive Methods, v. 19, p. 1-15, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920916976.

Longman, J. et al. The role of social isolation in frequent and/or avoidable hospitalisation: rural communitybased service providers’ perspectives. Australian Health Review, v. 37, n. 2, p. 223-231, 2013. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AH12152.

Necochea, L.; Cline, S. Border Pedagogy Cafes: Grassroots Conversations that Matter. Educational Forum, v. 72, n. 3, p. 245-259, 2008. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131720802046057.

Organização dos Estados Americanos. Direitos humanos e o envelhecimento na América Latina. Washington, D.C.: OEA, 2014.

Organização Mundial da Saúde. Relatório mundial sobre envelhecimento e saúde. Genebra: OMS, 2016.

Oswald, F.; Konopik, N. Impact of out-of-home activities, neighborhood and urban-related identity on well-being in old age. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, v. 48, n. 5, p. 401-407, 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-015-0912-1.

Smith, A. E.; Victor, C. R. Typologies of loneliness, living alone and social isolation, and their associations with physical and mental health. Ageing & Society, v. 39, n.8, p. 1709–1730, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000132.

Speck, J. Cidade caminhável: como design urbano pode salvar a nossa economia e a nossa saúde. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2016.

Stjernborg, V. The meaning of social participation for daily mobility in later life: an ethnographic case study of a senior project in a Swedish urban neighbourhood. Ageing International, v. 42, n. 3, p. 374-391, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-017-9296-4.

Taaffe, E. J.; Gauthier, H. L.; O’Kelly, M. E. Geography of Transportation. New Jersey: PrenticeHall, 1996.

Woolrych, R. Constructing and negotiating social participation in old age: Experiences of older adults living in urban environments in the UK. Ageing and Society, v. 41, n. 6, p. 1-23, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x19001569.

Ziegler, F.; Schwanen, T. I like to go out to be energised by different people’: An exploratory analysis of mobilityand wellbeing in later life. Ageing and Society, v. 31, n. 5, p. 758-781, 2011. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000498.

Published

2025-04-01

How to Cite

Xavier, S. C., Portella, A., Rocha, E., Correa, C. B., Chiarelli, L. M. A., & Libardoni, T. D. (2025). Paths to urban mobility and accessibility: challenges and perceptions of older adults in the city of Pelotas (Rio Grande do Sul). Oculum Ensaios - ISSNe 2318-0919, 22, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0919v22e2025a12958

Issue

Section

Dossiê: Envelhecimento, território e ambiente