FIDEDIGNIDADE DE DUAS TÉCNICAS DE CHECAGEM DE INSTRUMEN­TOS DE MEDIDA

Autores

  • Silas Marques de Oliveira

Palavras-chave:

fidedignidade, avaliação de coleção, instrumentos de avaliação

Resumo

A importância da aplicação de instrumentos de medidas fidedignos quando se avalia o valor da coleção de uma biblioteca é discutidamente, tudo. O teste-reteste de fidedignidade foi usado para determinar a fidedigni­dade de duas técnicas diferentes de medida de citação, especificamente, citações derivadas de periódicos e derivados de monografias. O chi-quadra­do para igualdade de proporções demonstrou que os periódicos podem ser instrumentos mais fidedignos sendo levantadas questões quanto a fidedig­nidade das monografias. 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

American Library Association. Collection Development Committee (1979). "Guidelines for Collection Development." Perkings, D.L., ed. ALA, Chicago.

Baughman, J.C. (1977). Towards a structural approach to collection development. College and Research Ubrarles 38, 241-248.

Bland, R.N. (1980). College textbooks as a too! for collection evalua­ tion, analysis and retrospectiva collection development. Llbrary Acqulsltlons 4, 193-197.

Bolglano, C.E. and King, M.K. (1978). Profiling aperiodicals collection. College and Research Llbrarles 39, 99-104.

Bonn, G.S. (1974). Evaluation of the collection. Llbrary Trends, 22, 265-304.

Broadus, R.N. (1971). The literatura of the social sciences: a survey of citation studies. lnternatlonal Social Sclence Journal 23, 238.

Broadus, R.N. (1977a). Evaluation of academic library collections: a survey of recent literatura. Llbrary Acqulsitions 1, 149-155.

Broadus, R.N. (1977b). The application of citation analysls to llbrary collection building. Advances ln Ubrarlanshlp 7, 229-335

Busha, C.H. and Harter, S.P (1980) Reaearchr Methods ln Llbra­ rlanshlp: Technique ahd lnterpretation. Academic Press, New York.

Buzzard, M.l. and New, D.I. (1983) lnvestigation of collection support for doctoral research. College and Research Ubrarles, 44, 469- 75.

Chambers, G.R. and Healey, J.S. (1973). Joumal citations ln master's theses: one measurement of a journal collectíon. Journal of the Amerlcan Society for lnformation Sclence, 24, 397-401.

Coale, A. (1965). Evaluation of a research library collection. Ubrary Quarterly, 35, 173-184.

Comer, C. (1981). list checking as a method for evaluation of library collectlons. Collectlon Bulldlng, 3, 26-34.

Emerson, W.L (1957). Adequacy of engineering resources for docto­ ral research in a university library. College and Research Ubra­ rles, 18, 455-460.

Gallagher, KE. (1981). The application of selected evaluative measu­ resto thelibrary·s monographic ophthalmology collection. Bulletln of the Medical Ubrary Assoclatlon, 69, 36-39.

Gove, P.B. (1961). Webster's Thlrd New lnternatlonal Dlctlonary of the Engllsh Language: Unabridged. G & C Merriam, Springfield, ll.

Jewett, e.e. (1849). Report of the Assistant Secretary relativa to the library. Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smlthso­ nlan lnatltute, 3, 34-47.

Kidder, L. (1981). Research Methods ln Saciai Relatlons. 4th. ed.

Holt, Rirnhart & WinstonAmerican Library Association. Collection Development Committee (1979). "Guidelines for Collection Development." Perkings, D.L., ed. ALA, Chicago.

Baughman, J.C. (1977). Towards a structural approach to collection development. College and Research Ubrarles 38, 241-248.

Bland, R.N. (1980). College textbooks as a too! for collection evalua­ tion, analysis and retrospectiva collection development. Llbrary Acqulsltlons 4, 193-197.

Bolglano, C.E. and King, M.K. (1978). Profiling aperiodicals collection. College and Research Llbrarles 39, 99-104.

Bonn, G.S. (1974). Evaluation of the collection. Llbrary Trends, 22, 265-304.

Broadus, R.N. (1971). The literatura of the social sciences: a survey of citation studies. lnternatlonal Social Sclence Journal 23, 238.

Broadus, R.N. (1977a). Evaluation of academic library collections: a survey of recent literatura. Llbrary Acqulsitions 1, 149-155.

Broadus, R.N. (1977b). The application of citation analysls to llbrary collection building. Advances ln Ubrarlanshlp 7, 229-335

Busha, C.H. and Harter, S.P (1980) Reaearchr Methods ln Llbra­ rlanshlp: Technique ahd lnterpretation. Academic Press, New York.

Buzzard, M.l. and New, D.I. (1983) lnvestigation of collection support for doctoral research. College and Research Ubrarles, 44, 469- 75.

Chambers, G.R. and Healey, J.S. (1973). Joumal citations ln master's theses: one measurement of a journal collectíon. Journal of the Amerlcan Society for lnformation Sclence, 24, 397-401.

Coale, A. (1965). Evaluation of a research library collection. Ubrary Quarterly, 35, 173-184.

Comer, C. (1981). list checking as a method for evaluation of library collectlons. Collectlon Bulldlng, 3, 26-34.

Emerson, W.L (1957). Adequacy of engineering resources for docto­ ral research in a university library. College and Research Ubra­ rles, 18, 455-460.

Gallagher, KE. (1981). The application of selected evaluative measu­ resto thelibrary·s monographic ophthalmology collection. Bulletln of the Medical Ubrary Assoclatlon, 69, 36-39.

Gove, P.B. (1961). Webster's Thlrd New lnternatlonal Dlctlonary of the Engllsh Language: Unabridged. G & C Merriam, Springfield, ll.

Jewett, e.e. (1849). Report of the Assistant Secretary relativa to the library. Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smlthso­ nlan lnatltute, 3, 34-47.

Kidder, L. (1981). Research Methods ln Saciai Relatlons. 4th. ed. Holt, Rirnhart & Winston. New York.

Kinnear, T.C. and Taylor, J.R. (1987). Marketing Reaearch: an Ap­ plied Approach. 3rd. ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Krejcie, A.V and Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educatlonal & Psychologlcal Measurement, 30,608. New York.

Kinnear, T.C. and Taylor, J.R. (1987). Marketing Reaearch: an Ap­ plied Approach. 3rd. ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Krejcie, A.V and Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educatlonal & Psychologlcal Measurement, 30,608.

Lancaster, F.W.(1977).TheMeasurement andEvaluatlon of Llbrary Servlcea. lRP, Washington o.e. pp. 165-206.

Lopez, M.D. (1969). A gulde for beginning bibliographers. Llbrary Resourcea & Technlcal Services, 13, 462-70.

Lopez,M.D.(1983).TheLopez citationtechnique ofin-depthcollection evaluation explicated. College and Research Llbrarles, 4, 251-5.

Martin, P. G. (1952). Characterlstlcs of the Llterature Used by Authora of Books on Polltlcal Toplcs, Unpublished dissertation, University of Chicago.

Mclnnls, M.R.(1971). Researchcollections: anapproach to theasses­ sment of quality. IPLO Quarterly, 13, 11-22.

Mosher, P.H. (1984). Ouality and llbrary collections. Advances ln Ubrarlanshlp, 13, 211-238.

Nisonger, T.E. (1980). Anin-depth collection evaluation at the Univer­ slty of Manltoba llbrary: a test of the Lopez method. Llbrary Re­ aourcea & Technlcal Services, 24, 329-337.

Nisonger, T.E. (1983). A test of two citation checking techniques for evaluating politlcal science collectlons ln university libraries. Llbra­ ry Resources & Technlcal Services, 27, 163-174.

Oliveira, S.M. (1986). Evaluatlon of the Llbrary Management Col­ lectlon of the Unlverslty of llllnols' Ubrary & lnformatlon Sclen­ ce Llbrary, Unpubllshed paer, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Popovich, C.J. (1978). The characteristicsof a collectlon for research ln business/management. College and Research Ubrarles, 39, 110-117.

Porta. M.A. and Lancaster, F.W. (1988). Evaluation of a scholarly collection ln a specific subject area by bibliographic checking: a comparison of sources. Ubrl. 38, 131-139.

Powell, R.R. (1985).Baslc Research Methods for Ubrarlana. Ablex, Norwood.

Price, D.S. (1963). Llttle Sclence, Blg Sclence. Columbia University Press. New York.

Sineath, T.W. (1970). The Relatlonshlp Between Slze of Research Ubrary Collectlon and the Support of Faculty Research Studles, Unpublíshed dissertatlon. University of Illinois at Urbana­ Champaign.

Stewart, J.L. (1970). Toe literatura on polltics: a citation analysis. lnternatlonal Ubrary Revlew, 2, 329-353.

Strayer, M.S. (1971). A creative approach to collection evaluation. IPLO Quarterly,13, 23-28.

Voos, H. (1981). Collection evaluation. Collectlon Bulldlng, 3, 6-11.

Webb, W. (1969). Project COED. A universlty library collection evalua­ tion and development program.Ubrary Resources and Technlcal Services, 13, 457-462.

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

25-11-1992

Como Citar

Oliveira, S. M. de. (1992). FIDEDIGNIDADE DE DUAS TÉCNICAS DE CHECAGEM DE INSTRUMEN­TOS DE MEDIDA. Transinformação, 4(1/2/3). Recuperado de https://puccampinas.emnuvens.com.br/transinfo/article/view/1655

Edição

Seção

ARTIGOS