Comparative analysis of information retrieval and analysis of open access tools from an educational concept
Keywords:
Vegetable oil, Content analysis, International patent classification, Patents, CombustionAbstract
The patent document is a measurement unit for scientific and technological productivity commonly used as a technological indicator. Patent studies mainly focus on frequency counts by year, country, assignee and inventor. There are scarce studies on the technical classifications and contents of the invention. The aim of this paper is to propose the use of the International Patent Classification and content analysis of some fields of the patent document as a unit of measurement and analysis to conduct a study on patent metrics in the technological domain vegetable oil combustion. A set of simple and relational indicators were used and the software proINTEC analyzed the data. The interpretation of the results proves that the information contained in patent documents from this domain is relevant for the goals of the project in the present case study.
Downloads
References
Basberg, B. Foreign patenting in the U.S. as a technology indicator: The case of Norway. Research Policy, v.12, n.4, p.227-237, 1983.
Basberg, B. Technological change in the Norwegian whaling industry: A case-study in the use of patent-statistics as a technology indicator. Research Policy, v.11, n.3, p.163-171, 1982.
Braam, R.R.; Moed, H. F.; Van R.; Anthony F. J. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I: structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v.42, n.4, p.233-251, 1991.
Buzydlowski, J.; White, H. D.; Lin, X. Term co-occurrence analysis as an interface for digital libraries. In: Bomer, K. & Chen, C. (Ed.). Visual interfaces to digital libraries. Berlin: Springer, 2002, p.133-144. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, v.2539).
Callon, et al. From translation to problematic networks an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information Sur les Sciencies Sociales, v.22, n.2, p.191-235, 1983.
Díaz-Pérez, M.; Moya-Anegón, F. El análisis de patentes como estrategia oportuna para la toma de decisiones innovadoras. El Profesional de la Información, v.17, n.3, 2008.
Fattori, M., Pedrazzi, G.; Turra, R. Text mining applied to patent mapping: A practical business case. World Patent Information, v. 25, n.4, p.335–342, 2003.
Gil Kim, Y.; Hwan Suh, J.; Chan Park, S. Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology. Expert Systems with Applications, v.34, n.3, p.1804-1812, 2008.
Grupp, H.; Schmoch, U.; kuntze, U. Patents as potential indicators of the utility of ec research programmes. Scientometrics, v.21, n.3, p. 417-445, 1991.
Klitkou, A.; Gulbrandsen, M. The relationship between academic patentingand scientic publishing in Norway. Scientometrics, v.82, n.1, p.93-108, 2010.
Leydesdorff, L. The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update. Scientometrics, v.76, n.1, p.159-167, 2008a.
Leydesdorff, L. Patent classifications as indicators of Intellectual organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v.59, n.10, p.1582-1597, 2008b.
Leydesdorff, l.; Heimeriks, G. The self organization of the European Information Society: The case of “biotechnology”. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, v.52, n.14, p.1262-1274, 2001.
Narin, F. Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, v.30, n.1, p.147-155, 1994.
Narin, F.; Olivastro, D. Technology indicators based on patents and patent citations. In: Van Raan, A.F.J. (Ed.). Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers, 1988.
Narin, F. Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientometrics, v.34, n.3, p.489-496, 1995.
Organización Mundial de la Propriedad Intelectual. Classificación internacional de patentes: guia, 2014. Disponible en: <http://www.wipo.int/pct/es/>. Acceso en: 10 jun. 2013.
Pao-Long, C.; Chao-Chan, W.; Hoang-Jyh, L. Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: a case of carbon nanotube field emission display. Scientometrics, v.82, n.1, p.5-19, 2010.
Pavitt, K. Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems. Scientometrics, v.7 n.1-2, p.77-99, 1985.
Pavitt, K. Uses and abuses of patent statistics. In: Van Raan, A.F.J. (Ed.). Handbook of Quantitative studies of science and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers, 1988. p.509-536.
Rip, A.; Courtial, J.P. Co-word maps of biotechnology- an example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, v.6, n.6, p.381-400, 1984.
Shneiderman, B.; Plaisant, C. Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: Multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. In: Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods For information Visualization BELIV’06, 2006, New York. Proceedings… New York: ACM Press, 2006. p.1-7.
Spinak, E. Indicadores cienciométricos. Ciência da informação, v.27, n.2, p.141-148, 1998.
Yuen-Hsien T.; Chi-Jen, L.; Yu-I L. Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing and Management, v.43, n.5, p.1216-1247, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Transinformação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
