Culture and anomie in data sharing

a perspective from the researchers

Authors

Keywords:

Anomie, Data sharing, Culture, Data management

Abstract

The retention or release of data may vary according to the culture or prevailing values of a particular area of knowledge or practices adopted by individual researchers. Anomie can occur when there is an imbalance between institutional goals and cultural values, with greater relevance of collective or individual cultural values. In this way, researchers may disagree with institutional goals and engage in deviant behavior. The objective was point out clues of cultural influence on the state of anomie in researchers in the process of managing and sharing their data. Documentary, exploratory research, and the Content Analysis method were used with the application of a framework that considers the institutional and individual dimensions. The results pointed to indications that researchers have little clarity about institutional goals for data management and sharing. It is concluded that the possible anomie in the researchers’ context is associated with the lack of knowledge or dubiousness about institutional, social, and moral norms, imbalance between goals and the ways to achieve them, noncompliance with institutional guidelines and poor data management skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, v. 52, n. 2, p. 179-211, 1991.

Bardin, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2010.

Champieux, R. et al. Ten simple rules for organizations to support research data sharing. PLOS Computational Biology, v. 19, n. 6, e1011136, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011136.

European Commission. Turning FAIR into reality. Luxemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.

Final Report and Action Plan from the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR Data. Disponível em: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/.../turning_fair_into_reality_1.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2019.

Franco, M.L.P.B. Análise de conteúdo. 2. ed. Brasília: Liber Livros, 2008.

Godoy, A.S. Pesquisa qualitativa: tipos fundamentais. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 35, n. 3, p. 20-29, 1995. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rae/v35n3/a04v35n3.pdf. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2018.

Hedoux, J.; Dubar, C. La socialisation: construcciòn de identités sociales et professionelles. Revue Française de Pédagogie, v. 100, p. 117-121, 1992. Disponível em: https://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/rfp_0556-7807_1992_num_100_1_2509_t1_0117_0000_2.pdf. Acesso em: 19 maio 2020.

Hernández-Pérez, T.; Méndez Rodríguez, E. Improving health research in EU through FAIR Data. European Union: FAIR4Health Consortium, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.google.com/search?q=Improving+health+research+in+EU+through+FAIR+Data.+European+Union%3A+FAIR4Health+Consortium%2C+2018&oq=Improving+health+research+in+EU+through+FAIR+Data.+European+Union%3A+FAIR4Health+Consortium%2C+2018&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBBzk2N2owajeoAgiwAgE&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2020.

Kim, Y. Fostering scientists’ data sharing behaviors via data repositories, journal supplements, and personal communication methods. Information Processing & Management, v. 53, n. 4, p. 871-885, 2017. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306457316305908. Acesso em: 20 set. 2018.

Kim, Y.; Adler, M. Social scientists’ data sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories. International Journal of Information Management, v. 35, n. 4, p. 408-418, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.007.

Kim, Y.; Stanton, J.M. Institutional and individual influences on scientists’ data sharing practices. Journal of Computational Science Education, v. 3, n. 1, p. 47-56, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.shodor.org/media/content//jocse/volume3/issue1/Kim. Acesso em: 29 set. 2018.

Kim, Y.; Stanton, J. M. Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists data-sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 4, p. 776-799, 2016. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/asi.23424&gt. Acesso em: 29 set. 2018.

Kim, Y.; Zhang, P. Understanding data sharing behaviors of STEM researchers: The roles of attitudes, norms, and data repositories. Library & Information Science Research, v. 37, n. 3, 189-200, 2015. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0740818815000584. Acesso em: 21 mar. 2020.

Merton, R.K. Sociologia: teoria e estrutura. São Paulo: Mestre Jou, ©1968.

Merton, R.K. The normative structure of science. In: Merton, R.K. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973. p. 223-280.

Monteiro, E.C.S.A. Operacionalização de repositórios de dados: uma análise sobre as perspectivas e atitudes dos pesquisadores nas questões de autoria e licença. 2021. 268 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) – Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília, 2021. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/214671. Acesso em: 5 maio 2022.

Monteiro, E.C.S.A.; Sant’Ana, R.C. Factors that influence researchers’ state of anomie in the research data sharing process. Mobile Network Applications, v. 27, p. 1952-1957, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-022-01967-x.

Monteiro, E.C.S.A.; Sant’Ana, R.C.G. Desafios no compartilhamento de dados: anomia relacionada aos direitos autorais. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v. 28, e41032, 2023a. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/41032. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Monteiro, E.C.S.A.; Sant’Ana, R.C.G. Anomia de pesquisadores no compartilhamento de dados. Em Questão, v. 29, e122627, 2023b. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/emquestao/a/QwC4mrvhJhYxZV9ZGzMw7wm/?format=pdf&lang=pt. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Piwowar, H.A.; Chapman, W.W. Public sharing of research datasets: A pilot study of associations. Journal of Informetrics, v. 4, n. 2, p. 148-156, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.11.010.

Santos, J.L. O que é cultura. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2006. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5767487/mod_resource/content/1/O%20que%20%C3%A9%20Cultura%20%20-%20Jose%20Luiz%20dos%20Santos.pdf. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

Scott, W.R. Contemporary institutional theory. In: Scott, W.R. Institutions and organizations. London: Thousand Oaks:SAGE, 1995. Chapter 3, p. 32-62.

Scott, W.R. Institutional theory’s past and future contributions to organization studies. Interviewer: Juliana Marangoni Amarante. Interviewee: W. Richard Scott. BAR: Brazilian Administration Review, v. 13, n. 3, e160070, 2016. Disponível em: https://bar.anpad.org.br/index.php/bar/article/view/381/391. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

Wiltz J.L. et al. Modernizing CDC’s practices and culture for better data sharing, impact, and transparency. Preventing Chronic Disease, v. 21, n. 18, p. 1-7, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.230200.

Published

2024-12-09

How to Cite

Monteiro, E. C. de S. de A., & Sant’Ana, R. C. G. (2024). Culture and anomie in data sharing: a perspective from the researchers. Transinformação, 36. Retrieved from https://puccampinas.emnuvens.com.br/transinfo/article/view/7095

Issue

Section

Original