SEEQ questionnaire
a feedback instrument for the improvement of the teaching-learning process
Keywords:
Teacher evaluation, Higher education, Information instrument, SEEQAbstract
The main objective of this article is to analyze the metric properties of students’ perception about the teaching activity in higher education through the application of the validated questionnaire “Student Evaluation of Educational Quality”, in of Strategic Management of the Degree in Labour Relations and Human Resources subject, at the University of Extremadura. This study is carried out by means of a quantitative analysis, analyzing the metrics of the questionnaire based on the opinion of the students. Of the eight dimensions analyzed, the “Personal Attitude” dimension stands out with a value of 4.85 out of 5, which translates into the importance of the teacher’s predisposition, both in terms of increasing the student’s academic performance, as well as the social benefits in the classroom. The results show the general satisfaction that students have with the teaching crew through this learning technique. Finally, with the Spearman correlation between dimensions, it is shown that the opinion reflected by the students, in the questionnaire, is not conditioned by the marks they obtain in the exams.
Downloads
References
Abelaira, T. A.; Redondo, B. M. Labour Relations and Human Resources: Students’ Perceptions of Their Training in Digital Competences. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, v. 8, n. 2, p. 1-24, 2022. https://doi. org/10.31261/IJREL.2022.8.2.04.
Arias-Masa, J. et al. The SEEQ questionnaire for validating the teaching improvement when introducing digital storytelling in higher education. 2017 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), p. 1–6, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2017.7975713.
Balam, E. M.; Shannon, D. M. Student ratings of college teaching: A comparison of faculty and their students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 35, n. 2, p. 209-221, 2010. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1080/02602930902795901.
Pérez-Tejada, H. Estadística para las ciencias sociales, del comportamiento y de la salud [CD]. México: Cengage learning, 2008.
George, D.; Mallery, P. IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: a simple guide and reference. New York: Routledge, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765.
Ginns, P.; Prosser, M.; Barrie, S. Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: The perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education, v. 32, n. 5, p. 603-615, 2007. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1080/03075070701573773.
Guix, J. Dimensionando los hechos: la encuesta (II). Revista de Calidad Asistencial, v. 20, n. 3, p. 154-160, 2005. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1134-282X(08)74741-9.
Hernández Sampieri, R.; Fernández Collado, C. Metodología de la investigación. México: MacGraw-Hill, 1998.
Lind, D. A. Marchal, W.; Samuel A. Estadística aplicada a los negocios y la economía. México: MacGraw-Hill, 2008.
Maldonado, L. S. M. Manual práctico para el diseño de la Escala Likert. Xihmai, v. 2, 2012. Doi: https://doi. org/10.37646/xihmai.v2i4.101
Marsh, H.; Roche, L. SEEQ Students’ Evaluation of Educational Quality: multiple dimensions of university teacher self-concept. Instructional Science, v. 8, n. 5, p. 439-469, 1970. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026576404113
Marsh, H. W. SEEQ: a reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students’evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 52, n. 1, p. 77-95, 1982. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1982.tb02505.x
Marsh, H. W. Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential baises, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 76, n. 5, p. 707, 1984. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742- 3_9
Matés, M. V. V.; Bouzada, M. I. C. Valoración de la enseñanza: SEEQ. Revista de Formación e Innovación Educativa Universitaria, v. 3, n. 4, p. 182-193, 2010.
Montgomery, D. C.; Runger, G. C. Applied statistics and probability for engineers. Estados Unidos de América: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
Nie, N. H.; Bent, D. H.; Hull, C. H. SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences. Michigan: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
Pallás, J. M. A. et al. Métodos cuantitativos para la administración pública: técnicas y aplicaciones. Virginia: Brooks Cole Publishing Company, 2019.
Ramsden, P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, v. 16, n. 2, p. 129-150, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750791123 31382944.
Roig-Vila, R. et al. La Aplicación Kahoot! para Motivar la Participación Activa en el Aula. Redes de Investigación En Docencia Universitaria, n. 1, p. 342-352, 2018. Disponible en: http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/85010. Acceso en: 8 sept. 2022.
Rosales, M. Proceso evaluativo: evaluación sumativa, evaluación formativa y Assesment su impacto en la educación actual. Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación, n. 4, p. 662, 2014. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2017.10.1.009
Sánchez Meca, J.; López Pina, J. A. El enfoque meta-analítico de generalización de la fiabilidad, 2008. Doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ft.2009.05.005
Scriven, M.; Tyler, R.; Gagne, R. M. Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. The Methodology of Evaluation, p. 39-83, 1967.
Silveira, J. T.; Teixeira da Rocha, J. B. Tradução e ferramenta de validação de conteúdo de avaliação do ensino pelos alunos. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, v. 10, n. 2, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15366/ riee2017.10.2.003
Stroebe, W. Student evaluations of teaching: no measure for the TEF. Times Higher Education, 2016. Recuperado de: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/Comment/Student-Evaluations-Teaching-No-Measure-Tef.
Wilson, K. L; Lizzio, A.; Ramsden, P. The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, v. 22, n. 1, p. 33–53, 1997. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/030750797 12331381121.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
