The social dimension of musical genres: why commercial and non-commercial classification systems vary

Authors

  • Rose Marie SANTINI Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Keywords:

Collaborative classification, Phonographic industry, Popular music, Classification systems

Abstract

The aim of the paper was to analyze the col/aborative development of classification systems in the fie/d of popular music and discuss how they may differ from those established and guided by the music •ndustry so far. Therefore, we compare the collaborative classification of mus;c that emerges on the Internet with that used by the Phono9raphic lndustry based on the data collected at two websites: Last.fm and AIIMJsic. Through this comparison we found differences between the c/assification cnteria used by users and the commercia/ principies of c/assification found in the catalogues of record labels and music publishers. The results indica te adisuepancy between the uiteria used by the industry to classify artists who belong to the some musical genre and/or market segment, and those associated by the users ,md actual/y perceived, appreciated and consumed by this public.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALLMUSIC LDT. Coverage statistics. 2009. Available from: . Cited: Mar. 22, 2009.

BECKER, HS. Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.

BERlSTEIN, B. Class, codes and contrai. Boston: Routledge, 1973.

BOURDIEU, P The field of cultural production, or: the economic world reversed. Poetics, n.12, p.311-356, 1985.

DIMAGGIO, PJ Market structures, the creative process, and popular culture. Journal of Popular Culture, v.11, p.436-452, 1977.

DIMAGGIO, P. Classification in art.American Sociological Review, v.52, p.440-455, 1987.

DIMAGGIO, P; STENBERG, K. Conforming and diversity in the american regional stage. ln: BALFE, J.; WYSZOMIRSKI, M. Arr, ideology and politics. New York: Praeger, 1985. p.116-140.

HEBDIGE, D. Subc ulture: the meaning of style. London: Methuen, 1979.

HENNING, V.; REICHELD, J. Mendeley a last.fm for research7 ln: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-SCIENCE, 4., 2008, lndianapolis, USA. Procceedings ... lndianapolis: Indiana University, 2008.

LAST. FM. Last.fm: radio announcement. 2009. Availablefrom: . Cited: Mar. 24, 2009.

MILLER, F.; STIKSEL, M.; JONES, R. Last.fm in numbers. London: CB5 1 nterative, 2008.

RICHARD, J. State of the industry 2007-2008: Last HQ. 2009. Available from: . Cited: Dec. 30, 2008.

PETERSON, R.A. The production of cultural change: the case of contemporany countr y music. Sacia! Research, v.45, p.292-314, 1978.

THOMPSON, A.E. Playing tag: an analysis of vocabulary patterns and relationships within a popular music folksonomy. Chapei Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2008.

WEBER, M. Economy and sociery. New York: Bedminster, 1968.

Published

2013-05-25

How to Cite

Rose Marie SANTINI. (2013). The social dimension of musical genres: why commercial and non-commercial classification systems vary . Transinformação, 25(2). Retrieved from https://puccampinas.emnuvens.com.br/transinfo/article/view/10444

Issue

Section

ARTIGOS ORIGINAIS